Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4947f/4947fb87fbec47ca46c132a07069d33ec1864a0c" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 front"
96 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS18
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FH5, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and FH5 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FH5 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-620 was released 18 months before the FH5 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FH5 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-620 scores vs the FH5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Panasonic FH5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FH5
E-620 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH5 over the Olympus E-620
FH5 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 18 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FH5
E-620 | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display size |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic FH5 has proportions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FH5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the E-620 versus the FH5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23f4b/23f4bc91e0d0bdd1f3c2668b00d28e9df499eecc" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and FH5 is 71 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87d13/87d13982710a540ff8de016d452cde74e99c3f24" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing technical specs. The graphic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and FH5.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic FH5 will show more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a447/1a447f8638b757b26e10cb3e4e631a5b9c2659cb" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dc60/2dc60679b1598c8ca6647a9c50023916f805c635" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FH5 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS18 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.1-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 121 gr (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | 260 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $169 |