Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88bb5/88bb5d6cdc2c05845f07f48bf0fd556e603fdf8e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 front"
95 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 141g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FP5, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FP5 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FP5 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-620 was revealed 18 months before the FP5 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FP5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-620 scores versus the FP5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic FP5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FP5
E-620 | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP5 over the Olympus E-620
FP5 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | ![]() | July 2009 | Newer by 18 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FP5
E-620 | FP5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 has got outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FP5 has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic FP5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-620 and the FP5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb5c/8fb5cc16b216ef66199bdea0de5726a1b9d65a2f" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and FP5 is 71 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4edab/4edab8b100933111f39bfaec65c4e920b3c0566c" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by seeing specs. The picture here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and FP5.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Panasonic FP5 will produce more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42dd3/42dd3ec5839aaa4b359015a3058f5d27cd9e2482" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfdd1/bfdd127c8b9fd45a335b22902e09f7e12cf27e8f" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FP5 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP5 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT Touch Screen LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 141g (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 260 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $799 | $199 |