Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d7f/41d7fcbf43c59375f793394d6bee3fc7ecff0e3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-124mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 129g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Overview
Here is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FS12 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FS12 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-620 was launched 3 months later than the FS12 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS12 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-620 grades versus the FS12 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Panasonic FS12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FS12
E-620 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS12 over the Olympus E-620
FS12 | E-620 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FS12
E-620 | FS12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | ![]() | April 2009 | Same generation |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic FS12 has dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-620 compared to the FS12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae5b/5ae5b5b1a5a58bb8d06ef9e7ac94e5b1ee578ee3" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and FS12 is 71 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2bf4/f2bf4259a653f1309b1a980377182698c179ef9c" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and FS12.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The E-620 comes with the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field less difficult.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cca21/cca21172d0c26b43fa8f457f4825d6582be10173" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a81bc/a81bcd3097c9767102ad71974cbb49673206b827" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS12 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS12 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 31-124mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lb) | 129 gr (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $799 | $228 |