Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FS25, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is very similar but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FS25 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-620 was launched 6 months after the FS25 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FS25 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-620 matches up versus the FS25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FS25
E-620 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus E-620
FS25 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FS25
E-620 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2009 | January 2009 | Similar age | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FS25 has sizing of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FS25 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 versus the FS25.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and FS25 is 71 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and FS25.
Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but different sensor dimensions. The E-620 has the larger sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field simpler.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 148g (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $230 |