Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
32
Overall
35

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
Panasonic FX75
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
  • 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview

The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FX75, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-620 was released 11 months before the FX75 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-620 scores versus the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FX75

 E-620 FX75 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-620

 FX75 E-620 
ReleasedJune 2010July 2009Newer by 11 months
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FX75

 E-620 FX75 
Screen dimensions2.7"2.7"Equal screen sizing
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FX75 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-620 and the FX75.

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and FX75 is 71 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at technical specs. The picture here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and FX75.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FX75 will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Portrait photography camera
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (12MP)
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-620
Street photography with Panasonic FX75
76
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus by touch
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography details
Panasonic FX75 Sports photography details
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 fps)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (500 CIPA)
39
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
max fps low (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FX75 Travel photography factors
53
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
missing Time Lapse function
bad battery power (500 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
67
comes with focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-620
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX75
53
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
megapixel count low (12MP)
bad battery power (500 per charge)
missing Time Lapse function
37
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic FX75 as a Vlogging camera
18
no video shooting
31
pretty wide (24mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FX75
 Olympus E-620Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-620 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75
Otherwise known as - Lumix DMC-FX70
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-07-06 2010-06-01
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ Venus Engine HD II
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 7 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.2-5.9
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m 7.40 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500g (1.10 pounds) 165g (0.36 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $799 $139