Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") have different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-620 was launched 8 years earlier than the FZ2500 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-620 matches up versus the FZ2500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-620 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-620
FZ2500 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 87 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-620 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FZ2500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 and the FZ2500.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and FZ2500 is 71 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by going through specifications. The pic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and FZ2500.
Plainly, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Panasonic FZ2500 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lb) | 915 gr (2.02 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 350 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $998 |