Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Announced July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-620 was launched 12 months earlier than the FZ35 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-620 scores against the FZ35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic FZ35
E-620 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-620
FZ35 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2010 | July 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic FZ35
E-620 | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen size | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has sizing of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-620 and the FZ35.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and FZ35 is 71 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and FZ35.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The E-620 has the bigger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 8.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lb) | 397 gr (0.88 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $999 |