Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Announced January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic ZS35, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-620 was launched 5 years earlier than the ZS35 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-620 grades against the ZS35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic ZS35
E-620 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-620
ZS35 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | July 2009 | Newer by 54 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic ZS35
E-620 | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic ZS35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-620 against the ZS35.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and ZS35 is 71 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and ZS35.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 305 grams (0.67 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $799 | $300 |