Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Revealed July 2009
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Announced January 2014
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Superseded the Panasonic ZS30
  • Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

The following is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic ZS35, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-620 was launched 5 years earlier than the ZS35 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-620 grades against the ZS35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-620 ZS35 
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-620

 ZS35 E-620 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014July 2009Newer by 54 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic ZS35

 E-620 ZS35 
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS35 has dimensions of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

See the Olympus E-620 versus Panasonic ZS35 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-620 against the ZS35.

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and ZS35 is 71 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and ZS35.

As you can see, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography info
Panasonic ZS35 Portrait photography info
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
supports RAW files
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
37
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Street photography camera
76
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
68
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (305 grams)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography info
Panasonic ZS35 Sports photography info
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
max fps low (4.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
53
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Travel photography factors
53
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
doesn't have Timelapse mode
terrible battery pack (500 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
68
lighter than competition (305 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
long reach (480mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography details
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography details
53
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
44
reasonably wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging information
Panasonic ZS35 Vlogging information
18
can't shoot video
34
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than competition (305g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus E-620Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus E-620 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Also called as - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2009-07-06 2014-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 7 21
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 500 grams (1.10 lb) 305 grams (0.67 lb)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $799 $300