Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
88 Imaging
44 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Released January 2016
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS50
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS70
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and ZS60 (18MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and ZS60 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-620 was unveiled 7 years prior to the ZS60 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS60 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-620 grades versus the ZS60 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Panasonic ZS60 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Panasonic ZS60
E-620 | ZS60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS60 over the Olympus E-620
ZS60 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2016 | July 2009 | Newer by 79 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Panasonic ZS60
E-620 | ZS60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 has outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS60 has proportions of 112mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") along with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 against the ZS60.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and ZS60 is 71 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and ZS60.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS60 will result in more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Panasonic ZS60 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ80 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2016-01-05 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 282g (0.62 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 19.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 10.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 109 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $799 | $248 |