Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Launched June 2013
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-620 versus Pentax Efina, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the Efina (14MP) is very similar but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and Efina (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-620 was brought out 4 years prior to the Efina and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-620 scores against the Efina with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 and Pentax Efina. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Pentax Efina
E-620 | Efina | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus E-620
Efina | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 47 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Pentax Efina
E-620 | Efina | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 provides exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Pentax Efina has dimensions of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 versus Pentax Efina in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-620 and the Efina.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and Efina is 71 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and Efina.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Pentax Efina will deliver greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax Efina Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Pentax Efina | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Pentax Efina |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2013-06-03 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 20cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1400s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lb) | 91 gr (0.20 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 200 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $799 | $10 |