Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Released July 2013
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1 Overview
Following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus E-620 versus Pentax MX-1, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the MX-1 (12MP) is very similar but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and MX-1 (1/1.7") have totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-620 was released 5 years prior to the MX-1 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax MX-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-620 grades versus the MX-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 and Pentax MX-1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Pentax MX-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Pentax MX-1
E-620 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Olympus E-620
MX-1 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 48 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Pentax MX-1
E-620 | MX-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 has external measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Pentax MX-1 has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 versus Pentax MX-1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 compared to the MX-1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and MX-1 is 71 and 84 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The pic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and MX-1.
As you can tell, both cameras come with the identical megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The E-620 contains the larger sensor which should make achieving bokeh simpler. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax MX-1 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Pentax MX-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Pentax MX-1 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2013-07-01 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) | 391 gr (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 290 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | D-Li-106 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $799 | $400 |