Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Announced July 2011
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-620 versus Pentax RZ10, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the RZ10 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and RZ10 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-620 was launched 24 months earlier than the RZ10 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax RZ10 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-620 matches up vs the RZ10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Pentax Optio RZ10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Pentax RZ10
E-620 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus E-620
RZ10 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 24 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Pentax RZ10
E-620 | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal screen measurements | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Pentax RZ10 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 versus Pentax RZ10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-620 and the RZ10.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and RZ10 is 71 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and RZ10.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-620 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Pentax RZ10 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 178g (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 178 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $799 | $200 |