Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III

Portability
71
Imaging
46
Features
50
Overall
47
Olympus E-620 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital III front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
35
Overall
34

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Launched July 2009
Ricoh GR Digital III
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
  • Launched July 2009
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR Digital IV
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview

In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is very close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital III (1/1.7") come with totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-620 was manufactured within a month of the GR Digital III which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-620 matches up versus the GR Digital III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-620 GR Digital III 
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Olympus E-620

 GR Digital III E-620 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Ricoh GR Digital III

 E-620 GR Digital III 
LaunchedJuly 2009July 2009Same age
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 has got exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital III has measurements of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") and a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-620 against the GR Digital III.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and GR Digital III is 71 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The photograph below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and GR Digital III.

As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-620 will render more detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital III as a Portrait photography camera
59
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
40
manual focus
delivers RAW files
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Digital III Street photography info
76
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
55
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Sports photography details
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
low battery (500 per charge)
17
can't change focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography details
Ricoh GR Digital III Travel photography details
53
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
no Time Lapse recording
low battery (500 per charge)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
63
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
low MP (10 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Digital III Landscape photography features
53
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
low battery (500 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
45
manual focus
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen is a good size (3")
delivers RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Digital III Vlogging highlights
18
lack of video recording
25
great maximum aperture (f1.9)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Ricoh GR Digital III
 Olympus E-620Ricoh GR Digital III
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-620 Ricoh GR Digital III
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-07-06 2009-07-27
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ GR engine III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 10MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 7 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 12.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500g (1.10 pounds) 208g (0.46 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $799 $399