Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS

Portability
71
Imaging
46
Features
50
Overall
47
Olympus E-620 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Revealed July 2009
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Released February 2014
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-620 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-620 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-620 grades against the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 E-620 WG-4 GPS 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus E-620

 WG-4 GPS E-620 
ReleasedFebruary 2014July 2009More modern by 55 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 E-620 WG-4 GPS 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 has exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-620 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-620 versus the WG-4 GPS.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and WG-4 GPS is 71 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and WG-4 GPS.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-620 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography advice
59
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detect focusing
supports RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
41
has manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography details
76
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
more heavy than others (235g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography features
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography features
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery pack (500 per charge)
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames/s)
small sensor (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (240 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography details
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography details
53
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
does not have Timelapse function
bad battery pack (500 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
69
environment proofing
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery life (240 per charge)
more heavy than others (235 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
53
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
MP count low (12MP)
bad battery pack (500 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse function
54
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
terrible battery life (240 CIPA)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Vlogging camera
18
no video
34
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing microphone support
more heavy than others (235g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
 Olympus E-620Ricoh WG-4 GPS
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-620 Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Class Entry-Level DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2009-07-06 2014-02-05
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 7 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 2.7" 3"
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500 gr (1.10 pounds) 235 gr (0.52 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 240 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $799 $210