Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47


90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-5 GPS

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-620 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor measurements.

The E-620 was released 5 years earlier than the WG-4 GPS which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-620 grades against the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
E-620 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus E-620
WG-4 GPS | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
E-620 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 has exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-620 versus the WG-4 GPS.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and WG-4 GPS is 71 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-620 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2014-02-05 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 235 gr (0.52 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 240 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $799 | $210 |