Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Samsung CL80 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
30
Overall
33

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
Samsung CL80
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2010
  • Alternate Name is ST5500
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and CL80 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-620 was launched 6 months prior to the CL80 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-620 matches up vs the CL80 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Samsung CL80

 E-620 CL80 
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus E-620

 CL80 E-620 
Display dimensions3.7"2.7"Larger display (+1")
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Samsung CL80

 E-620 CL80 
LaunchedJuly 2009January 2010Same generation
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-620 compared to the CL80.

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and CL80 is 71 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and CL80.

As you can see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung CL80 will produce more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively.

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung CL80 Portrait photography highlights
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW files
low MP (12MP)
28
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Street photography camera
Samsung CL80 as a Street photography camera
76
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports touch focus
fixed screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition in class (160g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography advice
Samsung CL80 Sports photography advice
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
slow frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
bad battery (500 CIPA)
38
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography information
Samsung CL80 Travel photography information
53
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
missing Timelapse function
bad battery (500 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
60
supports touch focus
decent MP (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (160 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography factors
Samsung CL80 Landscape photography factors
53
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (2.7")
low MP (12 megapixels)
bad battery (500 CIPA)
missing Timelapse function
37
bigger than average screen (3.7 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging factors
Samsung CL80 Vlogging factors
18
no video
27
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of mic socket
heavier than competition in class (160 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung CL80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Samsung CL80
 Olympus E-620Samsung CL80
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-620 Samsung CL80
Also called - ST5500
Type Entry-Level DSLR Ultracompact
Released 2009-07-06 2010-01-06
Physical type Compact SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4032 x 3024 4334 x 3256
Maximum native ISO 3200 4800
Maximum boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 7 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 31-217mm (7.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus range - 5cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3.7 inch
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1500 secs
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500g (1.10 lb) 160g (0.35 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $799 $400