Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Olympus E-620 versus Samsung EX2F, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is very comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") feature different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-620 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the EX2F and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-620 matches up versus the EX2F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 and Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Samsung EX2F
| E-620 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-620
| EX2F | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | December 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Samsung EX2F
| E-620 | EX2F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 versus Samsung EX2F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-620 against the EX2F.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and EX2F is 71 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact MP but different sensor measurements. The E-620 comes with the larger sensor which should make getting shallow DOF simpler. The older E-620 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Samsung EX2F |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 294g (0.65 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $799 | $478 |