Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
80 Imaging
54 Features
50 Overall
52
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 499g - 123 x 87 x 40mm
- Launched December 2010
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX10
- Replacement is Samsung NX20
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the NX11 (15MP) is pretty comparable but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and NX11 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-620 was manufactured 18 months earlier than the NX11 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX11 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-620 grades against the NX11 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Samsung NX11. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Samsung NX11 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Samsung NX11
| E-620 | NX11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX11 over the Olympus E-620
| NX11 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | December 2010 | July 2009 | More recent by 18 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Sharper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Samsung NX11
| E-620 | NX11 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 enjoys external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX11 has proportions of 123mm x 87mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 499 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-620 versus the NX11.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and NX11 is 71 and 80 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and NX11.
Plainly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX11 will provide greater detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX11 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Samsung NX11 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Samsung NX11 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2010-12-28 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | DRIM Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 15 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 11.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) | 499 gr (1.10 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 123 x 87 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 553 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 400 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $799 | $626 |