Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Samsung NX3000 front
Portability
89
Imaging
63
Features
62
Overall
62

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
  • Released May 2014
  • Earlier Model is Samsung NX2000
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 and Samsung NX3000, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and NX3000 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-620 was revealed 5 years earlier than the NX3000 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-620 matches up versus the NX3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Samsung NX3000

 E-620 NX3000 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus E-620

 NX3000 E-620 
ReleasedMay 2014July 2009More recent by 59 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution461k230kSharper display (+231k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Samsung NX3000

 E-620 NX3000 
Manually focus Very precise focus
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 enjoys exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Samsung NX3000 has dimensions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-620 and Samsung NX3000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-620 versus the NX3000.

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and NX3000 is 71 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor measurements only by going through a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and NX3000.

Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 having a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Samsung NX3000 will provide extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography factors
Samsung NX3000 Portrait photography factors
60
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
saves RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
77
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography factors
Samsung NX3000 Street photography factors
76
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
81
has a tilting screen
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lighter than average in class (230g)
very good high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung NX3000 as a Sports photography camera
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (500 CIPA)
56
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
max fps low (5.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography details
Samsung NX3000 Travel photography details
53
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
no Time Lapse recording
not so great battery (500 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
68
lighter than average in class (230g)
good megapixels (20MP)
no Time Lapse mode
does not feature selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-620
Landscape photography with Samsung NX3000
53
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inches)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (500 CIPA)
no Time Lapse recording
72
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
no Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging features
Samsung NX3000 Vlogging features
18
no video recording
34
features face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average in class (230g)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
no mic port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-620 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Samsung NX3000
 Olympus E-620Samsung NX3000
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-620 Samsung NX3000
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2009-07-06 2014-05-26
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 7 35
Cross type focus points - 1
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Available lenses 45 32
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Tilting
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 461 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames per second 5.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 500g (1.10 pounds) 230g (0.51 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light rating 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 pictures 370 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 B740
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2-30 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $799 $897