Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Superseded the Sony A380
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-620 versus Sony A390, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the A390 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-620 was launched 12 months before the A390 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact SLR).
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-620 grades versus the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A390
| E-620 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-620
| A390 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | July 2010 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A390
| E-620 | A390 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 provides physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-620 versus Sony A390 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-620 vs the A390.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and A390 is 71 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes purely by reviewing specs. The image underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and A390.
All in all, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-620 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A390 will offer you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A390 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
| Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2010-07-28 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Highest video resolution | None | None |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 549 grams (1.21 lb) |
| Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 55 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 22.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | 607 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photographs | 230 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $799 | $500 |
