Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
57
Features
52
Overall
55

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Superseded the Sony NEX-F3
  • Successor is Sony a5000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and NEX-3N (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-620 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the NEX-3N and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-620 scores against the NEX-3N in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony NEX-3N

 E-620 NEX-3N 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Olympus E-620

 NEX-3N E-620 
IntroducedFebruary 2013July 2009Fresher by 44 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony NEX-3N

 E-620 NEX-3N 
Manually focus Very accurate focus
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you should take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony NEX-3N has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-620 versus the NEX-3N.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and NEX-3N is 71 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by reading a spec sheet. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and NEX-3N.

As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony NEX-3N will offer you extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Portrait photography camera
60
has manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
66
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
external flash not possible
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography highlights
Sony NEX-3N Street photography highlights
76
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
77
tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
does not have image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography highlights
Sony NEX-3N Sports photography highlights
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (4.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery (500 per charge)
53
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
better than average battery pack (480 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Travel photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Travel photography camera
53
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery (500 shots)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
71
better than average battery pack (480 per charge)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography factors
Sony NEX-3N Landscape photography factors
53
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
low megapixels (12MP)
bad battery (500 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
70
manual focus
change lenses (Sony E mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (480 CIPA)
does not have image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-620
Vlogging with Sony NEX-3N
18
no video shooting
28
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
lack of mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-620 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony NEX-3N
 Olympus E-620Sony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-620 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Class Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2009-07-06 2013-02-25
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 3200 16000
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 7 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Total lenses 45 121
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500 gr (1.10 lbs) 269 gr (0.59 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 74
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 12.5
DXO Low light score 536 1067
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 480 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Price at release $799 $399