Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Announced September 2014
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1 Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus E-620 and Sony QX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Lens-style by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and QX1 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-620 was released 6 years earlier than the QX1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-620 grades against the QX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony QX1
| E-620 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus E-620
| QX1 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2014 |  | July 2009 | Newer by 62 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony QX1
| E-620 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 enjoys physical measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony QX1 has measurements of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") along with a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 and Sony QX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-620 against the QX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and QX1 is 71 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specifications. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-620 and QX1.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sony QX1 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-620 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-620 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Lens-style |
| Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 7 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | - |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 216 gr (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 440 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $799 | $500 |