Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
92 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 103 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the H55 (14MP) is relatively close but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and H55 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-620 was released 11 months prior to the H55 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H55 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-620 scores vs the H55 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Sony H55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony H55
E-620 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H55 over the Olympus E-620
H55 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 11 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony H55
E-620 | H55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 comes with exterior measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony H55 has dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-620 against the H55.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and H55 is 71 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through technical specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and H55.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Sony H55 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H55 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H55 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Slow Syncro, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) | 200 grams (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 103 x 58 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $235 |