Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- New Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are designed by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the FE-4030 (14MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the FE-4030 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) posses different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-4030 was revealed 7 years earlier than the E-M1 II which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise view of how the FE-4030 scores versus the E-M1 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus E-M1 II
FE-4030 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus FE-4030
E-M1 II | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | January 2010 | More modern by 81 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M1 II
FE-4030 | E-M1 II |
---|
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-4030 provides outside measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
See the Olympus FE-4030 and Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the FE-4030 vs the E-M1 II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and E-M1 II is 95 and 68 respectively.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The image here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4030 and E-M1 II.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The FE-4030 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus FE-4030 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-01-07 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 60.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146g (0.32 lb) | 574g (1.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | 1 | Dual |
Launch cost | $130 | $1,700 |