Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
93 Imaging
39 Features
31 Overall
35
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced January 2011
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-620 versus Sony H70, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and H70 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and H70 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-620 was released 18 months before the H70 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony H70 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-620 matches up against the H70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony H70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony H70
E-620 | H70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony H70 over the Olympus E-620
H70 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | July 2009 | More modern by 18 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony H70
E-620 | H70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 offers outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony H70 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 versus Sony H70 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the E-620 against the H70.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and H70 is 71 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes just by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and H70.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony H70 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony H70 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H70 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $199 |