Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1
71 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Introduced April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-620 and Sony HX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and HX1 (1/2.4") offer different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-620 was brought out 3 months after the HX1 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-620 scores against the HX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony HX1
| E-620 | HX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus E-620
| HX1 | E-620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony HX1
| E-620 | HX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 | April 2009 | Same age | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony HX1 has sizing of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 and Sony HX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 and the HX1.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and HX1 is 71 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and HX1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-620 will show extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
| Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
| Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-07-06 | 2009-04-22 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | 9.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1440x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 544g (1.20 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $799 | $47,999 |