Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
67 Imaging
32 Features
36 Overall
33
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 28-560mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 544g - 115 x 83 x 92mm
- Introduced April 2009
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-620 and Sony HX1, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and HX1 (9MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and HX1 (1/2.4") offer different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-620 was brought out 3 months after the HX1 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-620 scores against the HX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony HX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony HX1
E-620 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony HX1 over the Olympus E-620
HX1 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony HX1
E-620 | HX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | April 2009 | Same age | |
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony HX1 has sizing of 115mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") having a weight of 544 grams (1.20 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 and Sony HX1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 and the HX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and HX1 is 71 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out technical specs. The picture here should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and HX1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-620 because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-620 will show extra detail having its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX1 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX1 |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2009-04-22 |
Body design | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-560mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 9.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 pounds) | 544g (1.20 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 115 x 83 x 92mm (4.5" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $47,999 |