Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7925d/7925d4ec856623fe4c6a6caf3f9339a0fcd66771" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V front"
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Superseded the Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and HX400V (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and HX400V (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-620 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the HX400V which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-620 scores vs the HX400V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony HX400V
E-620 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Olympus E-620
HX400V | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 56 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony HX400V
E-620 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has got outer measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony HX400V has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the E-620 vs the HX400V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d63b4/d63b441ad9b209a54296c13c32d45b6a77fbe17f" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and HX400V is 71 and 62 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63e6d/63e6d4f98e2f0daa78f1db1aa4d62d9a836817e6" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The image below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-620 and HX400V.
As you can see, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-620 having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Sony HX400V will show extra detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more aged E-620 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64d36/64d365f55401d1085d88bc52609426baef09941b" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db2d5/db2d54f4c12ec1068a204063f2e7467e29ad6954" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2009-07-06 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 660g (1.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | 300 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $799 | $448 |