Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
79 Imaging
70 Features
57 Overall
64
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Revealed February 2013
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX1, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and RX1 (Full frame) feature different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-620 was announced 4 years before the RX1 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-620 grades vs the RX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony RX1
E-620 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Olympus E-620
RX1 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | July 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer display (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX1
E-620 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-620 enjoys physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1 has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-620 against the RX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-620 and RX1 is 71 and 79 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and RX1.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Sony RX1 will produce extra detail with its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2013-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-22.0 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lb) | 482g (1.06 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 270 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $799 | $2,798 |