Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Older Model is Sony RX10 II
- Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX10 III, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-620 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-620 grades against the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony RX10 III
E-620 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-620
RX10 III | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 81 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX10 III
E-620 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 features external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 vs the RX10 III.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and RX10 III is 71 and 53 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and RX10 III.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony RX10 III will show greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-06 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 1051 gr (2.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 536 | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 420 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $799 | $1,398 |