Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Announced July 2009
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Launched March 2016
  • Older Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX10 III, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-620 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-620 grades against the RX10 III when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony RX10 III

 E-620 RX10 III 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-620

 RX10 III E-620 
LaunchedMarch 2016July 2009Fresher by 81 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1229k230kSharper screen (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX10 III

 E-620 RX10 III 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-620 features external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-620 vs the RX10 III.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and RX10 III is 71 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and RX10 III.

All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony RX10 III will show greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-620 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-620
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
60
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focus
exports RAW files
sensor resolution low (12MP)
71
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
features face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-620
Street photography with Sony RX10 III
76
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
64
screen tilts
image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
environment sealing
heavier than competition in class (1,051g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography details
Sony RX10 III Sports photography details
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (500 shots)
70
great zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
great battery (420 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography advice
Sony RX10 III Travel photography advice
53
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
does not have Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (500 CIPA)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
55
great battery (420 per charge)
environment sealing
MP count good (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition in class (1,051 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography highlights
53
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is small (2.7 inches)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
bad battery power (500 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse mode
63
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW files
environment sealing
great battery (420 CIPA)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging details
Sony RX10 III Vlogging details
18
can't record video
28
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have external mic socket
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
heavier than competition in class (1,051 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus E-620Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-620 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Type Entry-Level DSLR Large Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-07-06 2016-03-29
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Max boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Min boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 7 25
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus range - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per second 14.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution None 3840x2160
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500 gr (1.10 pounds) 1051 gr (2.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 70
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 12.6
DXO Low light score 536 472
Other
Battery life 500 shots 420 shots
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $799 $1,398