Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cddf/4cddf48ab8a3b250116bee02e29a58a03a8cfb8a" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) front"/Sony-RX100-VA-front.jpg)
89 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Revealed July 2018
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX100 VA, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and RX100 VA (20MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and RX100 VA (1") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-620 was brought out 10 years prior to the RX100 VA and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-620 matches up versus the RX100 VA in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-620 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery and Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony RX100 VA
E-620 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Olympus E-620
RX100 VA | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2018 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 109 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX100 VA
E-620 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 has got physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX100 VA in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-620 compared to the RX100 VA.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd2c/6bd2c516ad897b5e8acc3d749b03bd1410e05640" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA size comparison"-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and RX100 VA is 71 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd2c/6bd2c516ad897b5e8acc3d749b03bd1410e05640" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA top view buttons comparison"-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements just by looking at technical specs. The photograph below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and RX100 VA.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-620 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony RX100 VA will give greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0fee/e0fee95f01a42376ae32808bcdd5769d9b89da19" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA sensor size comparison"-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6bd2c/6bd2c516ad897b5e8acc3d749b03bd1410e05640" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and Viewfinder comparison"-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2018-07-13 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lbs) | 299 grams (0.66 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 220 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $799 | $998 |