Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
76
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Announced July 2009
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Announced October 2015
  • Old Model is Sony RX1R
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II Overview

Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-620 versus Sony RX1R II, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Photography Glossary

The E-620 was launched 7 years earlier than the RX1R II which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-620 grades against the RX1R II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony RX1R II

 E-620 RX1R II 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-620

 RX1R II E-620 
AnnouncedOctober 2015July 2009More modern by 76 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1229k230kCrisper display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony RX1R II

 E-620 RX1R II 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has exterior dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony RX1R II has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-620 versus Sony RX1R II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-620 versus the RX1R II.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and RX1R II is 71 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and RX1R II.

As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-620 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony RX1R II will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 30 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-620 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography highlights
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography highlights
60
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
low MP (12MP)
85
focusing manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
amazing megapixels (42 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
has face detect focus
supports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography information
Sony RX1R II Street photography information
76
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
73
has a tilting screen
sensor size is large (Full frame)
supports RAW files
very good high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than others (507 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 Sports photography details
Sony RX1R II Sports photography details
48
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
low battery life (500 per charge)
63
amazing megapixels (42 megapixels)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
has tracking focus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
fixed focal length (35mm)
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low battery pack (220 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-620
Travel photography with Sony RX1R II
53
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
does not have Timelapse recording
low battery life (500 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
59
amazing megapixels (42MP)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse function
low battery pack (220 CIPA)
more heavy than others (507 grams)
does not have selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX1R II as a Landscape photography camera
53
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
low MP (12 megapixels)
low battery life (500 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
68
focusing manually
very good max aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inch)
amazing megapixels (42MP)
sensor size is large (Full frame)
no anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (35mm)
does not have image stabilization
low battery pack (220 shots)
missing Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging advice
Sony RX1R II Vlogging advice
18
lack of video recording
34
very good max aperture (f2.0)
has face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
includes microphone port
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
more heavy than others (507 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-620 vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus E-620Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-620 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Class Entry-Level DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-07-06 2015-10-13
Body design Compact SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III+ BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 42MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Highest enhanced ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 100 50
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 7 25
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0
Macro focus range - 14cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 1,229 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x 0.74x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 4.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500 gr (1.10 lbs) 507 gr (1.12 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 97
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 25.8
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 13.9
DXO Low light score 536 3204
Other
Battery life 500 shots 220 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch price $799 $3,300