Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
96 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Released July 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 110g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Olympus E-620 and Sony W560, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-620 (12MP) and the W560 (14MP) is very similar but the E-620 (Four Thirds) and W560 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-620 was introduced 18 months earlier than the W560 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W560 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-620 scores vs the W560 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony W560 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony W560
E-620 | W560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W560 over the Olympus E-620
W560 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2011 | July 2009 | Fresher by 18 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony W560
E-620 | W560 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-620 has outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony W560 has sizing of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-620 and Sony W560 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-620 and the W560.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and W560 is 71 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-620 and W560.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-620 with its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony W560 will offer you greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W560 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W560 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-07-06 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-104mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 pounds) | 110 grams (0.24 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $799 | $139 |