Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
32
Overall
36

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Revealed July 2009
Sony W650
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and W650 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and W650 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-620 was revealed 3 years earlier than the W650 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-620 scores versus the W650 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony W650

 E-620 W650 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Olympus E-620

 W650 E-620 
AnnouncedJanuary 2012July 2009Fresher by 30 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony W650

 E-620 W650 
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 features outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony W650 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 versus the W650.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and W650 is 71 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and W650.

Clearly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sony W650 will offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-620
Portrait photography with Sony W650
60
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
saves RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
34
decent MP (16 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography highlights
Sony W650 Street photography highlights
76
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
63
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average in class (124g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W650 as a Sports photography camera
48
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
low MP (12MP)
bad battery (500 shots)
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
low frames per second (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography information
Sony W650 Travel photography information
53
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
does not have Timelapse function
bad battery (500 CIPA)
low MP (12MP)
69
lighter than average in class (124g)
decent MP (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
no Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.6)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 Landscape photography information
Sony W650 Landscape photography information
53
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low MP (12 megapixels)
bad battery (500 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse function
43
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
manual exposure not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
no Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-620
Vlogging with Sony W650
18
no video recording
33
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
lighter than average in class (124 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony W650
 Olympus E-620Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-620 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2009-07-06 2012-01-10
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 7 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-125mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.6-6.3
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology HyperCrystal LCD Clear Photo TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1600 secs
Continuous shutter rate 4.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 12.00 m 3.70 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 500 grams (1.10 lb) 124 grams (0.27 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.3 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 536 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 220 photographs
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse feature
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $799 $140