Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
96 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
- 124g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and W650 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and W650 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe E-620 was revealed 3 years earlier than the W650 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W650 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-620 scores versus the W650 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony W650 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony W650
E-620 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony W650 over the Olympus E-620
W650 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | July 2009 | Fresher by 30 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony W650
E-620 | W650 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-620 features outside dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony W650 has measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-620 versus the W650.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and W650 is 71 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and W650.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-620 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Sony W650 will offer you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony W650 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W650 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2009-07-06 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 7 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.6-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD | Clear Photo TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 500 grams (1.10 lb) | 124 grams (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 220 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, microSD/micro SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at release | $799 | $140 |