Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64480/644809c7cb457398a507243d270ad7296f34c2c0" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 front"
94 Imaging
42 Features
38 Overall
40
Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-6.5) lens
- 166g - 96 x 55 x 25mm
- Launched February 2013
- Renewed by Sony WX350
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-620 and Sony WX300, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and WX300 (18MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and WX300 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-620 was unveiled 4 years prior to the WX300 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony WX300 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-620 matches up vs the WX300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony WX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony WX300
E-620 | WX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony WX300 over the Olympus E-620
WX300 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 44 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony WX300
E-620 | WX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 offers external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Sony WX300 has specifications of 96mm x 55mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 166 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-620 and Sony WX300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-620 compared to the WX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7597/d7597f911dbecccd7ac10f411ab886f97f55b838" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-620 and WX300 is 71 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afdfe/afdfe09468afb314b2c840517c6979563eb24678" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing technical specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and WX300.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-620 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Sony WX300 will provide you with more detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-620 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e053/0e0531654773985864ef4abe6cdfac48f5d5e63a" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10b7b/10b7b5e79242f76b11f5f8aacccb17109d02a9a2" alt="Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-620 vs Sony WX300 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX300 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 7 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.5 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 4.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500 gr (1.10 pounds) | 166 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 96 x 55 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $799 | $330 |