Clicky

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55

Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48
Olympus E-620 front
 
Sony SLT-A55 front
Portability
67
Imaging
56
Features
80
Overall
65

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Key Specs

Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Sony A55
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Revealed August 2010
  • New Model is Sony A57
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Overview

Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-620 and Sony A55, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and A55 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A55 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-620 was revealed 13 months prior to the A55 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).

Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-620 grades vs the A55 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A55

 E-620 A55 

Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Olympus E-620

 A55 E-620 
RevealedAugust 2010July 2009Fresher by 13 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kCrisper display (+691k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A55

 E-620 A55 
Manually focus More precise focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Selfie screen Both good for selfies
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 offers external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony A55 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Sony A55 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-620 against the A55.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and A55 is 71 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and A55.

As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A55 will offer more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-620 Portrait photography info
Sony A55 Portrait photography info
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
73
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-620 Street photography info
Sony A55 Street photography info
76
fully articulated screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
77
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-620
Sports photography with Sony A55
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
max frames per second very slow (4.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (500 shots)
68
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
terrible battery power (380 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-620 Travel photography details
Sony A55 Travel photography details
53
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
does not have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery pack (500 shots)
low MP (12 megapixels)
62
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
does not have Timelapse mode
terrible battery power (380 CIPA)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-620 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A55 as a Landscape photography camera
53
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
low MP (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse recording
67
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
terrible battery power (380 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-620 Vlogging details
Sony A55 Vlogging details
18
no video
78
display is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have microphone port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-620 and Sony A55
 Olympus E-620Sony SLT-A55
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-620 Sony SLT-A55
Category Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2009-07-06 2010-08-24
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic III+ Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 7 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 500g (1.10 lbs) 500g (1.10 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 73
DXO Color Depth rating 21.3 23.0
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.3 12.4
DXO Low light rating 536 816
Other
Battery life 500 photographs 380 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $799 $800