Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
67 Imaging
56 Features
80 Overall
65
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Revealed August 2010
- New Model is Sony A57
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Olympus E-620 and Sony A55, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-620 (12MP) and A55 (16MP) and the E-620 (Four Thirds) and A55 (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-620 was revealed 13 months prior to the A55 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the E-620 grades vs the A55 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-620 & Sony SLT-A55. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-620 Gallery & Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Sony A55
E-620 | A55 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Olympus E-620
A55 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2010 | July 2009 | Fresher by 13 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-620 and Sony A55
E-620 | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-620 offers external dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony A55 has specifications of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-620 and Sony A55 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-620 against the A55.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-620 and A55 is 71 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-620 and A55.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-620 having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A55 will offer more detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older E-620 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-620 vs Sony A55 Specifications
Olympus E-620 | Sony SLT-A55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-620 | Sony SLT-A55 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-07-06 | 2010-08-24 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 7 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 45 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 500g (1.10 lbs) | 500g (1.10 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.3 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.3 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 536 | 816 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | 380 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $799 | $800 |