Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced February 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus SH-2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and SH-3 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-25 was manufactured 8 years before the SH-3 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the FE-25 grades vs the SH-3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-25 and Olympus Stylus SH-3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-25 Gallery and Olympus SH-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Olympus SH-3
| FE-25 | SH-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Olympus FE-25
| SH-3 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2016 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 86 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Clearer display (+348k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Olympus SH-3
| FE-25 | SH-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-25 has got physical dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus SH-3 has dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-25 vs the SH-3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-25 and SH-3 is 98 and 88 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-25 and SH-3.
To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus SH-3 to resolve more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older FE-25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus SH-3 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Olympus Stylus SH-3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2016-02-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.4" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 112k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.5 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 271 grams (0.60 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 380 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $15 | $579 |