Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus FE-25 versus Olympus TG-310, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-25 was manufactured 24 months before the TG-310 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the FE-25 matches up versus the TG-310 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-25 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Olympus TG-310
| FE-25 | TG-310 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus FE-25
| TG-310 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Olympus TG-310
| FE-25 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 provides outside measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-25 versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-25 compared to the TG-310.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-25 and TG-310 is 98 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-25 and TG-310.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-310 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older FE-25 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $15 | $0 |