Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
94 Imaging
36 Features
33 Overall
34
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus FE-25 versus Olympus TG-310, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-25 was manufactured 24 months before the TG-310 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the FE-25 matches up versus the TG-310 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-25 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Olympus TG-310
| FE-25 | TG-310 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus FE-25
| TG-310 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 24 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Olympus TG-310
| FE-25 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 provides outside measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Olympus FE-25 versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the FE-25 compared to the TG-310.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-25 and TG-310 is 98 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-25 and TG-310.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-310 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The older FE-25 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2011-01-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LI-42B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $15 | $0 |