Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FE-25 was launched 5 years before the TG-830 iHS which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the FE-25 scores vs the TG-830 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-25 & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| FE-25 | TG-830 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus FE-25
| TG-830 iHS | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 48 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Clearer screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
| FE-25 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-25 offers external dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the FE-25 compared to the TG-830 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and TG-830 iHS is 98 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-25 and TG-830 iHS.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give you extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged FE-25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-25 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 112k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $15 | $0 |
