Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus FE-25 versus Olympus TG-3, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe FE-25 was unveiled 6 years prior to the TG-3 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-25 grades versus the TG-3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-25 & Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Olympus TG-3
| FE-25 | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus FE-25
| TG-3 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 63 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Crisper display (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Olympus TG-3
| FE-25 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 comes with physical measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-25 versus Olympus TG-3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the FE-25 and the TG-3.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the FE-25 and TG-3 is 98 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by researching specifications. The visual below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-25 and TG-3.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-3 to provide you with more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older FE-25 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-25 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 112k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $15 | $350 |
