Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL2 versus Pentax Q-S1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the Q-S1 (12MP) is relatively close but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") feature totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL2 was introduced 4 years earlier than the Q-S1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-PL2 scores against the Q-S1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Pentax Q-S1
| E-PL2 | Q-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus E-PL2
| Q-S1 | E-PL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2014 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 42 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Pentax Q-S1
| E-PL2 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys exterior dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL2 versus Pentax Q-S1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL2 against the Q-S1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and Q-S1 is 85 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and Q-S1.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The E-PL2 uses the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The more aged E-PL2 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2011-02-11 | 2014-08-04 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic V | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax Q |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 8 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 362g (0.80 lb) | 203g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photographs | 250 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-5 | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $250 |
