Clicky

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
98
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Olympus FE-25 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus FE-25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 0
  • No Video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
  • Announced January 2009
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced July 2011
  • Renewed by Olympus VR-330
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and VR-320 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The FE-25 was introduced 3 years prior to the VR-320 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summation of how the FE-25 matches up versus the VR-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Olympus VR-320

 FE-25 VR-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus FE-25

 VR-320 FE-25 
AnnouncedJuly 2011January 2009More modern by 30 months
Display dimension3"2.4"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution230k112kCrisper display (+118k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Olympus VR-320

 FE-25 VR-320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-25 has got external dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the FE-25 compared to the VR-320.

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-25 and VR-320 is 98 and 94 respectively.

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-25 and VR-320.

As you can see, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged FE-25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus FE-25
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-320
19
no manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
33
resolution is good (14MP)
has face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus FE-25
Street photography with Olympus VR-320
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low maximum ISO (0)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Sports photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography factors
16
can't change focal length (()mm)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
47
great zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-25 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
61
has built in flash
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
70
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
resolution is good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
long reach (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography factors
27
very good max aperture (f)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
tiny screen (2.4 inches)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
low maximum ISO (0)
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse function
42
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (14MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Vlogging advice
Olympus VR-320 Vlogging advice
9
can't record video
32
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (158 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus FE-25 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-25 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus FE-25Olympus VR-320
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus FE-25 Olympus VR-320
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-01-07 2011-07-19
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Full resolution 3648 x 2768 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range () 24-300mm (12.5x)
Largest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.4 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 112k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 4.70 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 158g (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - LI-42B
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SD/SDHC
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $15 $179