Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax K-S2
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23


64 Imaging
63 Features
82 Overall
70
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax K-S2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 678g - 123 x 91 x 73mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Older Model is Pentax K-S1

Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax K-S2: A Hands-On Expert’s Comprehensive Camera Comparison
Choosing your next camera can sometimes feel like standing between an ultracompact pocket gadget and a robust DSLR - the kind of decision that’s easier said than done. Today, we’re diving deep into two very different cameras from Olympus and Pentax that cater to markedly different audiences and use cases: the diminutive Olympus FE-25 ultracompact and the solid Pentax K-S2 entry-level DSLR.
Both cameras bring distinct strengths and limitations to the table; yet, comparing them gives us an excellent chance to discuss practical photography requirements across genres - from casual travel snapshots to serious professional workflows. Having spent over 15 years rigorously testing cameras in studios, in the wild, and everywhere in between, I’m here to cut through the specs and offer you a candid, thorough evaluation based on hands-on experience.
Let’s start by putting their physical presence into perspective.
Size and Ergonomics: Pocket-Sized vs. Club for Thumbs
You really can’t understate how much size influences your relationship with a camera. Olympus FE-25 is an ultracompact, a true pocket rocket meant to disappear in your jacket pocket. It measures just 93 x 62 x 24mm - tiny enough to carry everywhere, with a button layout meant for casual and straightforward shooting.
Contrast that with the Pentax K-S2, a compact but solid DSLR boasting dimensions of 123 x 91 x 73mm and weighing in at 678 grams with battery. It’s designed to fit comfortably in your hands and support extended shooting sessions. You have physical dials, clubs for your thumbs on the rear, and more tactile controls that facilitate precise manual operation.
The Olympus is a pocket-friendly carry-anywhere, whereas the Pentax sports the ergonomics geared towards a photographer’s grip comfort.
If you value portability above all, Olympus wins hands down - why lug a DSLR if you just want a quick snap? But if control, handling, and extended use are priorities, Pentax is the clear winner ergonomically.
Body and Control Design: Simplified vs. Semi-Professional
The Olympus FE-25 is very much a point-and-shoot from 2009. Its control scheme is minimal, focused on simplicity and automation, without manual control modes or complex menus. It has no viewfinder, just a 2.4-inch fixed LCD with a modest 112k-dot resolution - adequate but uninspiring by modern standards. There’s no touchscreen or articulating display.
Meanwhile, the Pentax K-S2, announced in 2015, doubles down on DSLR features. It sports a fully articulated 3-inch 921k-dot LCD screen, ideal for composing unusual angles or selfies. The optical pentaprism viewfinder covers 100% of the frame at 0.64x magnification, supporting confident manual composition.
Notice the Pentax’s crowds of dials and buttons focused on customizability versus the FE-25’s clean, bare-bones top plate.
The K-S2 includes shutter/aperture priority, full manual modes, and customizable buttons. It is designed so you can switch quickly between sophisticated settings. The Olympus, on the other hand, sticks to automatic shooting with no exposure compensation, no manual focus rings - just quick, point-and-shoot, no fuss.
If you’re a photography enthusiast who loves being hands-on, K-S2’s controls will feel empowering. But if you want zero settings fuss and seamless snapshots, FE-25’s simplicity works.
Sensor Capabilities and Image Quality
Here’s where the real powerhouse difference emerges.
The Olympus FE-25 features a small 1/2.3" CCD sensor with 10-megapixels. By today’s technical standards and even comparing among 2009-era compacts, this sensor is incredibly limited in dynamic range, low-light capability, and resolution fidelity. There is an anti-alias filter, meaning some detail softening to avoid moiré patterns. It shoots JPEGs only - no RAW support.
In contrast, the K-S2 equips a 23.5 x 15.6mm (APS-C) CMOS sensor packing 20 megapixels with no anti-aliasing filter. This larger sensor offers vastly superior performance in terms of dynamic range, color depth, and especially noise control at higher ISO settings. It supports RAW capture, which for professionals and enthusiasts is non-negotiable for post-processing flexibility.
The difference in sensor real estate translates directly to superior image quality for the Pentax K-S2.
In practical testing, portraits, landscapes, and low light shots from the K-S2 have noticeably richer color nuances, less noise, and much greater detail retention than anything the FE-25 can deliver. To put it simply, the FE-25’s tiny sensor can get you basic snapshots with decent daylight exposure, but the K-S2 lets you craft higher-quality images under all but the most extreme lighting conditions.
Display and Interface
While live view is available on both cameras, the user experience differs vastly.
The Olympus FE-25’s LCD is small and low resolution (2.4” / 112K dots), which made composing shots on the fly challenging. It lacks touchscreen and articulating options, somewhat handicapping usability.
The Pentax K-S2’s fully articulated 3” LCD screen with 921k dots is a joy for live view photography, video recording, or capturing from challenging perspectives. The articulation especially benefits macro, vlogging, or street photography variants.
Pentax’s articulated, higher-res screen beats the Olympus’ fixed, lower-res LCD hands down.
The K-S2’s menu system retains Pentax’s reputation for logical layout and extensive customizability while remaining approachable to beginners. Olympus’s interface is simplified but restrictive.
Photography Genre Breakdown
Now, let’s analyze the real-world capabilities in various photographic disciplines.
Portrait Photography
Olympus FE-25:
- Pros: Quick enough autofocus for casual snapshots.
- Cons: No face/eye detection; small sensor delivers limited shallow depth of field, producing flat skin tones and uninspired bokeh.
Pentax K-S2:
- Pros: 11 AF points with face detection; sensor size and sharp lenses deliver excellent skin tone rendition, creamy bokeh, and control over depth of field.
- Cons: Lens choice (using Pentax KAF2 mount) affects ultimate portrait quality but generally excellent options are available.
Verdict: The K-S2 is definitely the choice if you care about nuanced skin tones and background separation.
Landscape Photography
The small Olympus sensor means often flat, lower dynamic range images - even with multisegment metering.
The Pentax K-S2, with its 20MP APS-C sensor and lack of AA filter, provides high detail resolution and excellent dynamic range to capture the subtleties of skies and foliage. Its weather sealing and dustproofing make it reliable in harsher field conditions, a big plus for outdoor landscape shooters.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The Olympus FE-25 offers no continuous shooting mode and limited autofocus capabilities, so fast-moving subjects are out of its league.
The Pentax K-S2 features 5.4 fps continuous shooting paired with 11 autofocus points (with tracking and face detection) - enough for casual wildlife and moderate sports action. The capability to mount telephoto lenses amplifies its reach.
Street Photography
Although compactness favors raw discretion, the FE-25’s dated sensor and control limitations hamper quality and fast shooting.
The K-S2’s articulated screen aids covert shooting angles, but the DSLR size demands attention. Still, it offers faster autofocus, better low-light ISO range, and better manual exposure control.
Macro Photography
The Olympus lacks image stabilization and manual focus tweaks; macro shooting is limited to approximate distance presets.
Pentax’s sensor stabilization and interchangeable macro lens options offer realistic focusing precision and magnification for macro enthusiasts.
Night and Astro Photography
Limited ISO range and small sensor make the Olympus FE-25 unsuitable for night or astro work.
Pentax K-S2 reaches ISO 51200 (native max), supports manual modes, long exposures down to 30 sec, and sensor stabilization - all critical for night and astro photographers.
Video Capabilities
The Olympus FE-25 offers basic Motion JPEG video with no HD or advanced recording options.
The Pentax K-S2 shoots Full HD at 30p, supporting MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs, with a microphone input - a welcome feature for vloggers and content creators.
Travel Photography
This is where form factor and versatility are key.
The Olympus FE-25 shines as a zippy backup or ultra-lightweight traveler’s camera.
Pentax K-S2 balances portability with versatility: solid battery life (410 shots), weather sealing, better image quality, and adaptability (changing lenses).
For those hunting lightweight travel ease + image quality, consider the K-S2’s size and lens choices carefully.
Professional Work
The Olympus FE-25 doesn’t support RAW or reliable manual controls, making it unsuitable for professional workflows beyond casual documentation.
The Pentax K-S2 delivers RAW files, extensive manual exposure options, and integration with Pentax’s lens ecosystem, making it a capable entry-level professional camera.
Autofocus Systems: The Heart of Responsiveness
The FE-25 relies on contrast-detection autofocus with no continuous AF, no face or eye detection, and a single AF point.
The K-S2 employs a hybrid system with 11 phase-detection points supporting continuous AF, tracking, selective AF, and face detection.
In real shooting scenarios, the K-S2 feels faster and more reliable in locking focus, especially on moving subjects and in low light, where the FE-25 struggles with hunting.
Build Quality and Durability
While the FE-25 is lightweight and plastic-bodied, it offers no weather sealing or shock resistance.
The Pentax K-S2 steps up with dustproof and weather-sealed construction, able to handle field conditions better.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
The FE-25 is a fixed-lens camera with no interchangeability, cornering it into its default zoom range and image quality.
The K-S2 uses the Pentax KAF2 mount, offering a rich and mature lens lineup. Pentax has over 150 lenses compatible including:
- Prime lenses for portraits and macro
- Telephoto lenses for wildlife and sports
- Wide-angle lenses for landscapes and architecture
This translates directly to creative freedom, which the FE-25 entirely lacks.
Battery and Storage
The Olympus FE-25’s battery life and storage options aren’t specified clearly, reflecting its minimal power demands but likely limited endurance.
Pentax K-S2 sports a rechargeable D-LI109 battery delivering up to 410 shots per charge and uses standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, a boon for professional use.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
FE-25 has no wireless connectivity, USB, HDMI, or GPS.
K-S2 includes built-in wireless (Wi-Fi), NFC for quick pairing with devices, USB 2.0, HDMI output, and optional GPS. These modern options integrate well within contemporary workflows.
Price-to-Performance Ratio Analysis
The Olympus FE-25 is a budget camera, often found for less than $20, making it irresistible for complete novices or as a backup.
The Pentax K-S2, priced around $580 (used pricing varies), sits firmly at entry-level DSLR territory, offering substantial value for image quality and flexibility.
It’s impossible to equate these two on price alone, but if you’re willing to invest a few hundred dollars more, the K-S2 will repay handsomely with performance.
You can see the K-S2’s sharp detail and dynamic range advantage over the FE-25’s softer, flatter output.
Overall Performance Ratings Summary
From the scorecard, Pentax K-S2 shines with higher marks in image quality, autofocus, build, and flexibility, whereas Olympus FE-25 offers decent portability and ease of use for casual use.
Genre-Specific Strengths and Weaknesses
- Portraits: Strongly favors K-S2
- Landscapes: K-S2 due to sensor and durability
- Wildlife/Sports: K-S2 for speed and reach
- Street: Mixed - FE-25 excels in stealth, but K-S2 compensates with speed and quality
- Macro: K-S2 dominant
- Night/Astro: K-S2 only contender
- Video: K-S2 dramatically better
- Travel: Depends - FE-25 for ultra-lifestyle travel; K-S2 for pro-capable travel
- Professional: K-S2 hands-down
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
Olympus FE-25: When to Buy
- You want the simplest possible camera that fits in your pocket.
- Photography is casual or completely new, with no need for manual controls or high image quality.
- Your budget is extremely tight or you want an ultra-light backup.
- You prefer instant point-and-shoot convenience over image fidelity.
Pentax K-S2: When to Buy
- You want a capable, entry-level DSLR for serious photography.
- You’re interested in manual control, RAW, and creative flexibility.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, action, or night photography.
- You want weather sealing and durable build quality.
- You’re willing to invest in lenses and expand your system.
- You want both good stills and competent video capability.
- Connectivity and workflow integration matter for your professional or enthusiast needs.
My Personal Take
In my experience with thousands of cameras, there’s something charming about the Olympus FE-25’s no-stress practicality, but it’s ultimately a camera from a bygone era, suitable only for the absolute basics. It’s perfect for the absolute cheapskate or a lightweight “pocket pal” when you can’t haul your main rig.
The Pentax K-S2, on the other hand, is a shining example of how entry-level DSLRs can provide robust, semi-professional features without bank-breaking prices. Its combination of image quality, lens options, and solid handling makes it a Swiss Army knife for many types of photography.
If you asked me personally to take a camera on a weekend trip where I want serious results without the bulk and complexity of a full pro body, I’d reach for the K-S2 every time. The Olympus FE-25? It might tag along only if I have absolutely zero space for anything else.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you find the right fit for your photography journey. Whether you value ease and portability or versatility and image craftsmanship, your perfect camera choice should always match your creative goals - not just your budget.
Happy shooting!
If you want any further hands-on tips or lens recommendations for the Pentax K-S2, just shout out. I’m here to help every step of the way.
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax K-S2 Specifications
Olympus FE-25 | Pentax K-S2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus FE-25 | Pentax K-S2 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2009-01-07 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | PRIME MII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | () | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 112 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.4 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on + redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync, manual flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | - | 678 grams (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 91 x 73mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI109 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $15 | $581 |