Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
93 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 157g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus FE-25 versus Pentax WG-1, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and WG-1 (14MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe FE-25 was unveiled 3 years before the WG-1 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax WG-1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short overview of how the FE-25 grades versus the WG-1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-25 & Pentax Optio WG-1. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Pentax WG-1
| FE-25 | WG-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 over the Olympus FE-25
| WG-1 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 | January 2009 | More modern by 25 months | |
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Crisper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Pentax WG-1
| FE-25 | WG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus FE-25 provides external dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Pentax WG-1 has sizing of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 157 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus FE-25 versus Pentax WG-1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the FE-25 compared to the WG-1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and WG-1 is 98 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-25 and WG-1.
To sum up, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Pentax WG-1 to deliver extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-25 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax WG-1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Pentax Optio WG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus FE-25 | Pentax Optio WG-1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-07 | 2011-02-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 157 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $15 | $350 |