Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1
98 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
66 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Released July 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and XG-1 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe FE-25 was brought out 6 years earlier than the XG-1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the FE-25 grades versus the XG-1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-25 & Pentax XG-1. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Pentax XG-1
| FE-25 | XG-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Olympus FE-25
| XG-1 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 67 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 112k | Crisper screen (+348k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Pentax XG-1
| FE-25 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-25 enjoys outer measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Pentax XG-1 has dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view size comparison of the FE-25 against the XG-1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FE-25 and XG-1 is 98 and 66 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at technical specs. The visual below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-25 and XG-1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Pentax XG-1 to give you greater detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older FE-25 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-25 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Pentax XG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus FE-25 | Pentax XG-1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2014-07-15 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | () | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.4" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 112 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dot |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | - | 567g (1.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LB-060 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $15 | $599 |