Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh CX1, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-25 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-25 was brought out around the same time to the CX1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FE-25 scores vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus FE-25 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh CX1
| FE-25 | CX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus FE-25
| CX1 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 112k | Sharper screen (+808k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX1
| FE-25 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 | February 2009 | Same generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 offers external dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh CX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-25 against the CX1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and CX1 is 98 and 93 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-25 and CX1.
Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus FE-25 to produce more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 112 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 180g (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $15 | $299 |