Clicky

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1

Portability
98
Imaging
32
Features
11
Overall
23
Olympus FE-25 front
 
Ricoh CX1 front
Portability
93
Imaging
31
Features
30
Overall
30

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs

Olympus FE-25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 0
  • No Video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
  • Announced January 2009
Ricoh CX1
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
  • 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
  • Released February 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview

Here is a detailed review of the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh CX1, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the FE-25 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is pretty comparable and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The FE-25 was brought out around the same time to the CX1 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the FE-25 scores vs the CX1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh CX1

 FE-25 CX1 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus FE-25

 CX1 FE-25 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution920k112kSharper screen (+808k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX1

 FE-25 CX1 
ReleasedJanuary 2009February 2009Same generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 offers external dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).

Compare the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh CX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the FE-25 against the CX1.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and CX1 is 98 and 93 respectively.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the FE-25 and CX1.

Clearly, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus FE-25 to produce more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Portrait photography features
Ricoh CX1 Portrait photography features
19
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
25
manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Street photography advice
Ricoh CX1 Street photography advice
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
low max ISO (0)
55
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh CX1 Sports photography highlights
16
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
MP count low (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-25 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Travel photography camera
61
built-in flash
great max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse recording
MP count low (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
59
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
MP count low (9MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-25 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh CX1 as a Landscape photography camera
26
great max aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
screen is small (2.4")
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
41
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
MP count low (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Vlogging details
Ricoh CX1 Vlogging details
9
no video shooting
28
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX1
 Olympus FE-25Ricoh CX1
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-25 Ricoh CX1
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2009-01-07 2009-02-19
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2768 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 28-200mm (7.1x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-5.2
Macro focus range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.4 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 112 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 180g (0.40 lb)
Dimensions 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - DB-70
Self timer - Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage - SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $15 $299