Clicky

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3

Portability
98
Imaging
32
Features
11
Overall
23
Olympus FE-25 front
 
Ricoh CX3 front
Portability
92
Imaging
33
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs

Olympus FE-25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 0
  • No Video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
  • Released January 2009
Ricoh CX3
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced June 2010
Photography Glossary

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX3, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the FE-25 (10MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The FE-25 was launched 17 months earlier than the CX3 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the FE-25 matches up vs the CX3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh CX3

 FE-25 CX3 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus FE-25

 CX3 FE-25 
IntroducedJune 2010January 2009More recent by 17 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen sizing3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution920k112kSharper screen (+808k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX3

 FE-25 CX3 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus FE-25 provides physical measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Look at the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX3 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the FE-25 against the CX3.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and CX3 is 98 and 92 respectively.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor measurements just by going through specifications. The visual below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-25 and CX3.

To sum up, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you should really consider the age of the cameras into account. The older FE-25 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh CX3 Portrait photography advice
19
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
26
you can focus manually
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Street photography factors
Ricoh CX3 Street photography factors
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
maximum ISO low (0)
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (206g)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Sports photography information
Ricoh CX3 Sports photography information
16
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus FE-25
Travel photography with Ricoh CX3
61
flash built-in
great maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
66
lighter than others in class (206 grams)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
low MP (10 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Landscape photography factors
Ricoh CX3 Landscape photography factors
26
great maximum aperture (f)
manual focus not available
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
tiny screen (2.4 inches)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (0)
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
42
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
manual exposure not available
low MP (10 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-25 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh CX3 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video recording
30
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (206 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh CX3
 Olympus FE-25Ricoh CX3
General Information
Make Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus FE-25 Ricoh CX3
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-01-07 2010-06-16
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3648 x 2768 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO - 3200
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range () 28-300mm (10.7x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.4 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 112 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 4.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 206 gr (0.45 pounds)
Dimensions 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - DB-100
Self timer - Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage type - SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $15 $329