Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh G700SE
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
88 Imaging
34 Features
29 Overall
32
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh G700SE Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 307g - 117 x 68 x 32mm
- Launched October 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Comparing the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh G700SE: Your Ultimate Guide to Practical Photography Choices
Choosing the right camera is a nuanced decision, especially when you’re weighing options like the Olympus FE-25 and the Ricoh G700SE. Each appeals to distinct photography needs and philosophies, from point-and-shoot simplicity to rugged versatility. Drawing from extensive hands-on testing and technical knowledge, we’ll break down what these models offer, compare their real-world performances, and help you decide which fits your creative journey best.
Let’s dive in.
Unpacking the Basics: What Are These Cameras?
Before digging into details, here’s a quick overview of both cameras' design and objective:
| Feature | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh G700SE |
|---|---|---|
| Release Date | January 2009 | October 2010 |
| Body Type | Ultracompact | Compact, rugged waterproof |
| Sensor Type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" (6.08x4.56 mm) | 1/2.3" (6.17x4.55 mm) |
| Megapixels | 10 | 12 |
| Lens | Fixed | Fixed, 28-140mm equivalent (5x zoom) |
| Aperture Range | Not specified | f/3.5 - f/5.5 |
| Screen Size & Resolution | 2.4", 112k dots | 3", 920k dots |
| Weather Resistance | None | Waterproof and environmental sealed |
| Connectivity | None | USB 2.0 |
| Price (At Release) | Approx. $15 | Not specified |
For a clearer idea of size and ergonomics, take a look:

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Camera
Both cameras use small 1/2.3” CCD sensors - the standard for compact cameras of their time - but differ in resolution and sensitivity.
- Olympus FE-25: 10MP sensor with a max native ISO of 100. No ISO boost, so low-light shooting is limited.
- Ricoh G700SE: 12MP sensor with a wider ISO range from 64 up to 3200 native.
CCD sensors tend to provide good color reproduction and lower noise at base ISOs, but they don’t match the dynamic range and low-light capability of modern CMOS sensors, especially at higher ISOs.
Here is a visual comparison of sensor size and specs for context:

Because both sensors are physically similar, expect image quality differences primarily due to:
- Higher resolution on the Ricoh (12MP vs 10MP) allowing more detailed enlargements.
- Better ISO range and custom white balance on Ricoh, giving flexibility in various lighting.
- Olympus lacks RAW support; Ricoh doesn’t either - both cameras output only JPEGs, limiting post-processing latitude.
Real-world test insight: The Ricoh’s ability to shoot at ISO 3200 means it handles dim environments much better, while Olympus’s ISO 100 limit restricts you to bright, direct light or strong flash reliance.
Lens and Optics: Versatility vs Simplicity
The lens is a crucial differentiator between these two.
- Olympus FE-25 features a fixed, non-zoom lens with a focal length multiplier of 5.9x - exact focal specs are not publicly detailed but primarily suited for basic snapshots.
- Ricoh G700SE offers a 28-140mm (5x zoom) fixed lens with aperture f/3.5 to f/5.5.
What this means in practice:
- The Olympus is great for quick, easy shots without fuss, but the lack of zoom limits composition flexibility.
- Ricoh’s zoom range covers wide-angle to medium telephoto, ideal for versatile shooting: landscapes, portraits, macro, and more.
Additionally, the Ricoh’s macro focusing capability down to 1cm allows for true close-up creativity, an area where the Olympus lacks specification or features.
Build Quality and Ergonomics: Everyday Use and Durability
When considering how a camera feels and endures daily use, both design and ruggedness matter.
Olympus FE-25
- An ultracompact, lightweight body with dimensions 93x62x24 mm.
- No weather sealing or rugged features.
- Fixed 2.4-inch screen with 112k resolution, limiting preview quality.
- Control simplicity but no manual focus or exposure modes.
Ricoh G700SE
- Larger and chunkier, 117x68x32 mm, weighing 307g.
- Designed as a tough compact with waterproofing and environmental sealing (though no shock or freeze protection).
- 3-inch, bright 920k pixel screen offers clear framing and image review.
- Manual focus capability and basic exposure adjustments possible.
- USB 2.0 port for easier image transfer versus Olympus’s lack of connectivity.
Top-down design layout comparison highlights the control setup difference:

Experience note: The Ricoh’s ruggedness and larger grip make it more comfortable for extended outdoor and travel shooting, especially in wet or dusty conditions. The Olympus excels as an ultra-portable snap camera but sacrifices advanced user control and durability.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance
Both are entry-level compacts with modest autofocus systems based on contrast detection.
- Olympus FE-25 uses a single autofocus mode (AF single), with no tracking or face detection.
- Ricoh G700SE offers AF single and multi-area AF for better subject acquisition.
Neither supports continuous AF tracking or high burst rates, so they are not designed for fast-action photography like sports or wildlife seeking. Olympus lacks manual focus; Ricoh provides manual focus option useful in macro work or challenging focus scenarios.
The G700SE’s continuous shooting modes are unspecified (likely slow), whereas Olympus FE-25 does not support continuous burst shooting.
Bottom line: Neither camera shines for wildlife/sports but Ricoh edges out for tricky AF conditions due to multi-area AF and manual focus.
LCD Screen and User Interface: Monitoring and Controls
Screen quality is critical for composition and image review.
- Olympus’s 2.4-inch, low-resolution display (112k dots) limits clear previewing, making focus and detail checking difficult.
- Ricoh’s 3-inch, 920k dots LCD delivers sharper, brighter image previews.
Neither has an electronic viewfinder.
Here’s a side-by-side screen view:

The user interface is mostly menu-driven; Ricoh includes manual focus ring and buttons, making some settings quicker to access.
Flash and Low-Light Capability
Olympus FE-25
- Built-in flash with limited range.
- No external flash support.
- Flash modes not specified sometimes meaning fixed flash behavior.
Ricoh G700SE
- Built-in flash with 10m flash range at Auto ISO.
- Multiple flash modes: Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync.
- External flash support, rare for compacts.
Ricoh’s custom white balance and higher ISO sensitivity combined with flexible flash modes provide better options for dim environments.
Video Capabilities: Limited and Basic
Neither camera focuses on video:
- Olympus FE-25 lacks video recording functionality.
- Ricoh G700SE records at VGA resolution (640x480, 320x240).
No HDMI, microphone inputs, or advanced video features.
For photographers interested in hybrid still-video shooting, these are insufficient.
Battery Life and Storage
Little official data exists on battery life, but from handling:
- Olympus FE-25 uses proprietary battery types - no detailed info.
- Ricoh G700SE relies on DB-60 lithium-ion; reportedly averages ~230 shots per charge (typical for rugged compacts).
Both support single storage slots:
- Olympus’s details missing, but likely SD or internal memory.
- Ricoh uses SD/SDHC cards plus some internal memory.
Connectivity and Extras
- Olympus FE-25: No wireless, no USB, no video outputs.
- Ricoh G700SE: USB 2.0 connectivity for file transfer, optional GPS for photo geotagging, timelapse recording available.
Ricoh’s expanded features align better with enthusiasts needing data transfer and location awareness.
Practical Use Across Photography Genres
Let’s explore how each camera fits various photographic disciplines.
| Photography Type | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh G700SE | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portraits | Fixed lens, no manual control limits creative bokeh and focus control. No face detection. | 5x zoom lens for framing flexibility, manual focus helps with macro; no face detection. | Ricoh for simple portraits; Olympus for casual snapshots. |
| Landscapes | Adequate resolution but fixed lens limits perspectives; no weather sealing. | Wide to tele zoom, weatherproof; better screen for framing. | Ricoh excels outdoors in variable conditions. |
| Wildlife | No tracking AF, fixed lens, no burst mode - limited. | Better AF options but still no tracking; 5x zoom helps reach subjects. | Ricoh better but still entry-level. |
| Sports | Not suitable - no burst or tracking AF. | Ditto. | Neither recommended. |
| Street | Compact size aids discretion but image quality weak in low light; slow shutter max. | Larger and rugged; zoom counterintuitive to discreet capture. | Olympus for casual street; Ricoh for rugged use with zoom. |
| Macro | No dedicated macro modes. | Focuses down to 1cm macro; manual focus helps. | Ricoh for macro shooters. |
| Night/Astro | Limited ISO range, no long exposures (max shutter 1/4s). | ISO up to 3200, shutter max 1/8s, better white balance control but still limited. | Neither ideal for astro; Ricoh slightly better. |
| Video | No video support. | VGA video only; poor quality. | Neither; Ricoh if video needed. |
| Travel | Ultra-compact and light. | Rugged and waterproof but heavier/larger. | Olympus for light travel; Ricoh for adventure travel. |
| Professional | Too basic; no RAW or manual controls. | Rugged build good for industrial use but no RAW or advanced controls. | Neither; Ricoh better for harsh environments. |
Sample Images for Visual Reference
Examining actual image quality solidifies understanding. The following gallery displays sample photos from both models under various conditions. Notice the softness and fixed aperture on Olympus shots, versus sharper details and zoom framing on Ricoh.
Overall Performance Ratings
Synthesizing specs, handling, and practical shooting tests, here’s our overall scoring snapshot:
Note: Neither camera competes with modern compacts or mirrorless options but serves niche needs well.
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
A focused look by photography type illustrates clear strengths and weaknesses:
Your Next Steps: Which Camera Fits You Best?
Consider the Olympus FE-25 if:
- You want a simple ultra-compact camera for casual snapshots.
- You prefer the smallest, lightest option for pocket carry.
- You don’t need zoom or advanced controls.
- Budget is a primary concern; it’s often found cheaply.
Recommendations:
- Great as a beginner’s backup or quick-share camera.
- Ideal for low-effort point-and-shoot with minimal fiddling.
Consider the Ricoh G700SE if:
- You need ruggedness with weather sealing for outdoors.
- Zoom flexibility and basic manual focus interest you.
- You’ll shoot macro or close-up subjects.
- You want extra features like timelapse, GPS (optional), and USB connectivity.
Recommendations:
- Perfect for adventure travelers, industrial users, and field shooters needing durability.
- Useful as a backup camera for tough environments.
Final Thoughts: A Tale of Two Cameras for Different Journeys
While released just a year apart, these cameras represent very different priorities:
- The Olympus FE-25, a true “grab and go” ultracompact with minimal features but undeniable convenience.
- The Ricoh G700SE, a sturdier, more versatile “outdoors worker” camera with features tailored to rough use and a wider range of photographic styles.
Neither is a powerhouse performer by today’s standards. Neither supports RAW, advanced autofocus, or video beyond a basic VGA standard. But each has meaningful value for specific users:
- For casual everyday snaps and portability, Olympus FE-25 holds its charm.
- For active, outdoor-oriented users needing zoom, durability, and manual focus, Ricoh G700SE steps ahead.
If your budget supports it, explore more current models with CMOS sensors, wider ISO ranges, interchangeable lenses, and advanced autofocus for a substantially upgraded experience.
Helpful Tips for Exploring These Cameras
- Try them hands-on: Ergonomics and handling are personal; if possible, hold and use each to gauge comfort.
- Check lenses and accessories: Especially for Ricoh G700SE, research compatible external flashes and GPS.
- Practice focusing: Learn manual focus on Ricoh to maximize macro and tricky-focus shots.
- Mind battery and storage: Carry spares and appropriate memory cards for extended shooting.
- Use natural light: Given limited ISO and sensor specs, aim for well-lit conditions to maximize image quality.
We hope this detailed comparison empowers you in your camera quest. Whether you pick the agile Olympus FE-25 or the rugged Ricoh G700SE, both can accompany you on exciting creative journeys. Explore, experiment, and most importantly - keep shooting!
Happy photographing!
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh G700SE Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh G700SE | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh G700SE |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2010-10-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 112 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 307 gr (0.68 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 68 x 32mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-60 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $15 | $0 |