Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the FE-25 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-25 was launched 5 years before the GR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-25 matches up against the GR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-25 & Ricoh GR. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh GR
| FE-25 | GR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus FE-25
| GR | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2013 | January 2009 | Fresher by 52 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 1230k | 112k | Crisper screen (+1118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh GR
| FE-25 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-25 enjoys exterior dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the FE-25 vs the GR.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-25 and GR is 98 and 90 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-25 and GR.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-25 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh GR will show more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-25 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh GR |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2013-04-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.4 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 112k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 300s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 290 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB65 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | - | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $15 | $971 |