Clicky

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
98
Imaging
32
Features
11
Overall
23
Olympus FE-25 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Olympus FE-25
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 0
  • No Video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
  • Launched January 2009
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Released April 2013
  • Replacement is Ricoh GR II
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh GR, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and GR (16MP) and the FE-25 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) feature totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The FE-25 was launched 5 years before the GR and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the FE-25 matches up against the GR with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh GR

 FE-25 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus FE-25

 GR FE-25 
ReleasedApril 2013January 2009Fresher by 52 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen dimension3"2.4"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution1230k112kCrisper screen (+1118k dot)

Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh GR

 FE-25 GR 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-25 enjoys exterior dimensions of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Check the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh GR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the FE-25 vs the GR.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-25 and GR is 98 and 90 respectively.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FE-25 and GR.

As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The FE-25 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh GR will show more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The older FE-25 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR Portrait photography features
19
lack of manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
74
has manual focus
above average flash sync speed (1/4,000s)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Street photography info
Ricoh GR Street photography info
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low max ISO (0)
74
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lighter than others (245g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Sports photography information
Ricoh GR Sports photography information
16
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
45
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
low fps (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus FE-25 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Travel photography camera
61
has built in flash
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse mode
low MP (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
71
lighter than others (245g)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has built in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Landscape photography features
26
very good maximum aperture (f)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
screen is somewhat small (2.4")
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse mode
61
has manual focus
decent sized screen (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus FE-25 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
30
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others (245g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh GR
 Olympus FE-25Ricoh GR
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus FE-25 Ricoh GR
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-07 2013-04-17
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 3648 x 2768 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range () 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.4 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 112k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 300s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 245 grams (0.54 lb)
Dimensions 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 78
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.5
DXO Low light score not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 photographs
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - DB65
Self timer - Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type - SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $15 $971