Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh PX, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and PX (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe FE-25 was manufactured 3 years before the PX and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the FE-25 grades versus the PX when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-25 & Ricoh PX. The entire galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh PX
| FE-25 | PX |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus FE-25
| PX | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 31 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 112k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh PX
| FE-25 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus FE-25 enjoys outside measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has specifications of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the FE-25 vs the PX.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FE-25 and PX is 98 and 95 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-25 and PX.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh PX to render greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The older FE-25 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh PX |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-07 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 156 gr (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $15 | $329 |