Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh WG-30, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe FE-25 was launched 6 years prior to the WG-30 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the FE-25 grades versus the WG-30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are available at Olympus FE-25 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh WG-30
| FE-25 | WG-30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Olympus FE-25
| WG-30 | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 70 months | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 112k | Clearer display (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-30
| FE-25 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-25 provides outside measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-25 versus Ricoh WG-30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the FE-25 versus the WG-30.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the FE-25 and WG-30 is 98 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-25 and WG-30.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged FE-25 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-07 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 112 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 192 grams (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $15 | $428 |