Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W
98 Imaging
32 Features
11 Overall
23
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 0
- No Video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 62 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-30W, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the FE-25 (10MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-25 was revealed 6 years prior to the WG-30W which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus FE-25 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the FE-25 matches up vs the WG-30W for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-30W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-25 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-25 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| FE-25 | WG-30W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus FE-25
| WG-30W | FE-25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 70 months |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.4" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 112k | Clearer screen (+118k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-30W
| FE-25 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-25 features external measurements of 93mm x 62mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-25 and Ricoh WG-30W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the FE-25 compared to the WG-30W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the FE-25 and WG-30W is 98 and 91 respectively.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specs. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-25 and WG-30W.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-30W to offer you extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged FE-25 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus FE-25 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus FE-25 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-07 | 2014-10-09 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2768 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | () | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.4 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 112k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | - | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 62 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | - | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $15 | $280 |